links for 2007-10-31
Wednesday, October 31, 2007
-
Interesting collection of visual studies in mapping complex networks.
One of the most talked about points of contention in social networking to date is the idea of separating personal and professional networks. I've heard this from friends in the industry as well as from non-marketing friends. My industry friends all have an opinion. They, mostly, have all moved to Facebook and have limited interaction with LinkedIn. I don't, however, think this speaks for the majority of people as evidenced by my non-marketing friends who work in a variety of fields from non-profit, office equipment and financial services. They're just starting to connect with LinkedIn (the social networking primer?) and Facebook is a buzzword about as far away from them as the moon ("It's for kids").
Single Network with Overlap
Like I said, I have heard both sides of this story. Facebook, for example, is betting on the fact that you will consolidate all of your contacts (professional and personal) into one network. Further, they're releasing a way for people to group their contacts into personal and professional groups to aid you in this separation. (Note that it would be impossible to use LinkedIn as a social network in the way Facebook operates.)
The question with the consolidated network idea, in my mind, is the overlap. How do you deal with a co-worker, client or other contact who you know outside and inside the office? Do you want the client (no matter how close you are) seeing your weekend party images or images of "your friends" going back to homecoming and doing keg stands? That is the real trick with segmenting the overlap.
Separate Networks with Overlap
On the other side of the coin sits LinkedIn. They don't want to be your social network, they want to be your professional network. LinkedIn is betting that a physical separation between social and professional is how people want to keep things. LinkedIn is very professionally focused, image-light and keeps out-of-office banter to a minimum.
The main issue with this segmented approach is, again, the overlap. If you have professional friends on Facebook who you have professional contact with, you have to go to LinkedIn and invite them there as well. The same thing happens in LinkedIn where you have to go to Facebook to invite those you have social contact with.
In the end, I don't think this is an either/or situation. I think that this plays out at the individual level. Personally, I keep these two networks in sync manually and, in the end, they blur together for me. I don't post anything too personal on Facebook so I'll connect with anybody. LinkedIn is set up to do more with my information from a professional point of view. I can search companies, see who is connected easily, etc. Facebook needs to build these tools in to truly compete at the professional level.
The next generation of professional may use their Facebook network as the end-all, pro/social network where they do everything.
So how do you distinguish between the two? Do you actual patrol the people who you connect with on each and keep them separated? Do you keep em separated?
Technorati Tags:
Facebook, LinkedIn, Matt Dickman, social networks, tagging, Techno//Marketer, trends
Here is a look at what is happening across social media and new marketing this week. If there is anything that you would like to see in this post or if you have something you think is Buzz-worthy please drop me an email or leave a comment on this post. I want to make this as beneficial for you as I can.
Buzz Friday is also available as part of the Techno//Marketer Podcast on iTunes. Click here to subscribe and take the Buzz to go.
[Feed readers please click through to the post if you cannot see the video.]
Inside the video:
And in other news:
Top Five Web2.0 Movers of the Week (using Alexa data)
Top Ten Marketing Blogs from Viral Garden
Top 5 "Viral" Videos This Week
If you use another podcatcher you can grab my podcast RSS feed here.
You can watch this and other Techno//Marketer videos on your video channel of choice:
Technorati Tags:
trends, buzz, buzzfriday, matt dickman, Techno//Marketer
There has been a lot of talk about the idea of "life streaming" lately. The term, however, doesn't sit right with me. Life streaming is defined as the use of one online web service to collect RSS feeds and aggregate them into chronological order. The problem I have is that it's not life-streaming. Justin.tv is true life streaming. If you want my life-stream you'll have to follow me around with a camera (which would be pretty boring most days).
What you are streaming is your attention and so I am re-terming this attention-casting. My attention-casting locations look at what I post on this blog, what I bookmark on del.icio.us, the videos I add to YouTube, the items from other people's feeds (350+) that I think are important, photos I take and add to Flickr and items I digg on Digg.com. All of these feeds, when combined in chronological order, tell you what has my attention at that moment and lets you see trends as they happen.
The latest stream that I've created is on Twitter under the username TechnoMarketer. This feed is the best way to see what I think is important in the world of social media in close to real-time. If you decide to follow me there you'll know within 30 minutes when I:
One problem with this, and my biggest point of contention, is that this is one-way communication. Because these are aggregated from other services, there is little chance of feedback unless you come back from the original source. I do, however, think that there is value here is being able to see what I think is important almost immediately if you want to stay up to date on news and trends in new media and marketing.
What do you think? Is it valuable to you? Do you like to get information in one big chunk like my Buzz Friday posts?
Technorati Tags:
marketing, Matt Dickman, Techno//Marketer, attention-casting
I received an email from the MySpace crew the other day informing me that they were working on a new profile look-and-feel. I've had a lot of issues with MySpace's design, which I've noted before. Namely I think the advertising encroachment upon the user's personal space is out of hand. The result is that profile pages look cluttered and corporate.
The new version makes a step in the right direction. You can absolutely see a bit of Facebook UI influence and the advertising real estate has decreased by around 30% (in my estimation). The page uses more white space and puts more emphasis on making it feel more my own. The advertising is still way too prominent across the entire site, there is a complete lack of balance that I believe is one element of the exile of people from MySpace to Facebook.
Here are the old and new designs side-by-side. I've highlighted the personal space on the pages.
Old version | New version |
MySpace is still the king of traffic at almost 4 times that of Facebook, but Facebook is growing much more rapidly. I think one of the ways that MySpace could try to stop the flood is to focus more on the users. Whether that is in NewsCorp's plans is doubtful.
So what do you think?
Technorati Tags:
marketing, Matt Dickman, MySpace, social networks, Techno//Marketer, User Interface Design
My latest MarketingProfs Whiteboard//Session video looks at how Digg.com works as a community to add value and filter news.
Last Friday I took an Inside//Out look at social news community Digg.com by showing you what it looked like and went over the key functionality. In this edition of whiteboard session, I want to dig (pun intended) into how the system works as a community to add value to the users.
This functionality has been copied by many sites (Netscape.com was and recently shifted away from it) and is a good model to keep in the back of your mind for the future.
If you know of any topics, acronyms, technobabble or other sites you would like to see covered in a future post, please drop me an email.
If you use another podcatcher you can grab my podcast RSS feed here.
You can watch this and other Techno//Marketer videos on your video channel of choice:
Technorati Tags:
Digg, marketing, MarketingProfs, Matt Dickman, social media, Techno//Marketer, user generated content, whiteboard//session
My latest Inside//Out video covering social news site Digg.com is up and running now over at the MarketingProfs Daily Fix.
From MarketingProfs:
This video is geared to give you a visual overview, tell you why you should (or shouldn’t) care about Digg, and give you broad analysis of how the technology could help in other situations. You don’t have to sign up for 50 different networks, just let me do it and guide you through the latest, hottest options around.
I am sure that many of you have heard the name or see the tags around the internet and at the bottom of every blog post. Digg is a social news aggregator that relies on the community of “Diggers” to filter, share and vote on the top news. The site is categorized, but remains largely geared toward technical audiences.
Users of the site submit content by clicking on the Digg icon or submitting it through the site itself. Users add a description of the content along with the URL and tags for reference. Freshly "Dugg" content filters to an “upcoming” area where other users vote it up. Content that has a lot of diggs in a short amount of time move toward the home page at a faster pace (diggs*velocity=popularity).
Here is an Inside//Out look at Digg.com:
Key takeaways for marketers:
Look for a new Whiteboard//Session video Monday where I cover how Digg actually works. If you have anything you would like to see featured in the future send me an email.
If you use another podcatcher you can grab my podcast RSS feed here.
You can watch this and other Techno//Marketer videos on your video channel of choice:
Technorati Tags:
Digg, Inside//Out, marketing, MarketingProfs, Matt Dickman, social media, Techno//Marketer, technology, user generated content
Here is a look at what is happening across social media and new marketing this week. If there is anything that you would like to see in this post or if you have something you think is Buzz-worthy please drop me an email or leave a comment on this post. I want to make this as beneficial for you as I can.
Buzz Friday is also available as part of the Techno//Marketer Podcast on iTunes. Click here to subscribe and take the Buzz to go.
It's been a couple of weeks since I did a proper Buzz Friday post so here it is. Enjoy!
[Feed readers please click through to the post if you cannot see the video.]
Inside the video:
And in other news:
Top Five Web2.0 Movers of the Week (using Alexa data)
Top Ten Marketing Blogs from Viral Garden
Top 5 "Viral" Videos This Week
If you use another podcatcher you can grab my podcast RSS feed here.
You can watch this and other Techno//Marketer videos on your video channel of choice:
Technorati Tags:
trends, buzz, buzzfriday, matt dickman, Techno//Marketer
I am attending, and live blogging from, the Kent State University Media Mindsets Conference today. Nice speaker list on tap today. Among them Joshua Green from the MIT Convergence Culture Consortium, Hollis Towns the Executive Editor of the Cincinnati Enquirer and Bill Stewart of IBM Digital Media. I will be updating this post through the day and cross-posting it to my agency's blog here. They're streaming this live as well.
You can get real-time updates from this conference at my Twitter account.
Welcome from Robert Frank, KSU Senior VP and Provost
KSU has created their communication college to merge mass comm, journalist, comm, etc. to one curriculum to get students to hit the ground running. Creating partnerships with technology companies to conduct research.
Keynote from Bill Stewart, IBM Digital Media
"Creative destruction - trends and directions of new and traditional media companies"
Devices drive innovation through history. These devices + the internet are breaking through walls. iPod in Music, World of Warcraft in video games, Netflix downloads in movie rentals and IM/VoIP in communications.
This is leading to a user-centric fluid media lifestyle. Barriers to entry are lowering and will continue in next 3-5 years. Media companies will see an upheaval. New media companies must drive new strategies. Divergent paths will be forged.
Drivers of change. Devices, access, content innovation and buyer and consumer behavior shifts. These are predicated on the devices. The next inflection point will be around 3G+ mobile and broadband, connected devices.
As far as broadband is concerned, cable-to-home has the most US capacity. WiMAX has the most capacity in wireless, but is slow compared to the wired options. A song download from iTunes on wired access is <1 minute. The same song would take 33 minutes on WiMAX.
Primetime TV shift to digital is opening doors for other media. Outcomes include show willingness of consumers to pay, increase total consumption, creates piracy alternatives, shift downstream demand, challenge funding models (PPV) and opening service providers. YouTube traffic bigger than MTV.com. New models are shifting the revenue streams. iTunes = more revenue to the creator, YouTube = 100% to creator.
Business models and leading players are shifting to user contributed open platforms. traditional media is stuck in professional, proprietary quadrant. MySpace uniques in January 2007 close to Super Bowl viewership. Spending is not following the shift to new platforms.
Four prime business models:
Proprietary networks can either open up or shift to include more user generated content to move models. This shift can lead to more attention, first-hand learning and user intimacy and refresh their brand. Traditional creators need to figure out how to leverage these changes to capitalize on the changes from a strategic perspective. Music industry prime example of waiting and doing nothing.
Ad spending will change as well. TV spending will take the biggest hit by 2010. Internet spending will continue to grow. Newspaper and magazine will shrink, but not as quickly.
Current.tv model. 1 minute of TV programming costs between $1000 and $10000. Same cost on Current is around $500.
10 recommendations for media companies in the new media world:
Keynote from Hollis Towns, Cincinnati Enquirer
"Gannett and the Enquirer's response to it"
News media is shifting. Content is being created faster and looking at new platforms. Community conversation is very important for the Enquirer. Feedback through message boards, etc. is the new engagement strategy. Using moderated boards (why?) instead of open boards. Cincinnati.com is one of the top traffic sites in Ohio. 226 community web pages on the site now. Moving into digital in every way possible.
Moving to "total audience reach" instead of circulation. Community + web + print. Heavy focus on boomers. Abandoning the young reader print reach and trying new models of outreach (Cin Weekly). Readers are skewing a bit older than they'd thought.
Reaching out to local communities. Using "get published" platform to allow local officials and residents to publish hyper-local content.
CincyMoms.com site is hugely successful. Attempted to inject experts and other content, but was rejected by the community. Unfiltered community where the users are the subject matter experts. Self-policing area with a single, known moderator to look for libel or slanderous content.
Big push into video. Partnering with Scripps TV station. Have installed editing suites in the newsroom. Doing a daily webcast that is unpolished and unscripted - getting highest page views on the site. Have hired three full-time programmers to integrate 3rd-party data sources. Creating a community-centered resource for residents.
Created a boomer focus group. Reading styles are different. Boomers lean back and read, younger readers lean forward to read. Subtle differences, but important. Reporters are mobile working in Starbucks and Panera looking for new stories and rarely coming into the office.
Keynote from Joshua Green, MIT
"Losers, users and producers: what happens to the audience in a participatory age"
Consumer value chain is shifting. Where, what, how, who are all shifting. Loyalty is shifting as well, could be there today and gone tomorrow. Measurement and categories are changing quickly. Terminology is outdated and tired.
"Convergence Culture". Old and new and merging, shifting in unpredictable ways. Social, cultural and technological shifts = convergence. Transmedia texts - flow across multiple platforms. Conglomeration and cooperation of multiple media sources. Strategic cooperation growing. Media audiences are migratory; consume what they want when they want.
Living in a networked society, growing knowledge communities -> collective intelligence. Participatory culture is emerging as people rework content to be personal. Acquiring skills through play that are applied toward more serious ends. CSI driving interest in science, drives education down the road. Non-linear roadmaps to success.
Four ways to think about consumers:
Convergence altering distinctions between platform, medium, audience, channel and "content". Fans are not on the edge any more. Watching Sopranos on DVD through Netflix is still watching TV content, just not as part of the audience. The relationship between content and form is shifting. Content is being dis-embedded and re-embedded as consumers like.
"Viewser" - combines viewing and using content in ways not intended by creator. Watching shifting to interacting.
"Produser" - audiences are becoming content creators, making the flow of information easy to reverse.
"Collaborative media creators" - Wiki applications allow groups of users to great joint content.
Fan production operates in a different economy than the professional production. It's more of a gift economy than transactional.
Measurement. How to measure expressions vs. impressions. Hard to measure and compare.
Ideas changing. Control, value, reward, niche (collective niches).
John West, KSU
LCD: the Next Generation
KSU was the originator and is a top innovator in LCD technology. Industry is moving toward flexible technology and making HD fit smaller spaces. Display technology has kept up with science fiction. Technology is changing design patterns in major industry including automotive.
Kent Displays is introducing flexible LCD into small, commercial applications. Kent is using small, continuous improvements vs. introducing the killer display. Switchable LCD technology (used on glass windows) is moving to consumer products like ski goggles.
New displays will be printed/sandwiched, not in high-tech manufacturing facilities. The material is getting more like cloth and less like molded plastic. Interestingly, LCD technology is born from molecules in cholesterol.
Thoughts from afternoon student panel discussion:
Technorati Tags:
Kent State University, event, Matt Dickman, Techno//Marketer
So I was going through the Q&A over on Gooruze (where I am a founding Gooru) yesterday and came across a question by a member wanting to know what to do when a client asks for something "viral". I've seen this question a lot and I've weighed in on it before, but I have refined my thinking over time and wanted to share where I am right now.
The very first thing you have to do is collectively work to define viral. Viral is a goal, not a tactic. Asking the client what their campaign goals are is crucial. You can even ask them "what would be viral success for you?". Get as detailed as possible (400 pass alongs, 50 comments, etc.). As an agency, you have to decide if their expectations are realistic and make a go/no-go decision.
People have delusional dreams that millions of people clamoring for their content. The part that really matters is the engagement that a piece of content creates with your brand. So if something is watched 1,000,000 times and only 10 of those people know who you are and act on it, you have to ask if it's worth it. Alternatively, if something is seen 10 times and the same number know/learn who you are and act on it, your outcome is better. Which is viral to you?
Content that has the goal of becoming viral needs to hit a few key requirements no matter what.
If a client still doesn't get it, doesn't have goals or won't listen then you should run the other way. They'll never be satisfied, the product will suffer and they'll take you down with them.
Also, check out Seth Godin's take on viral vs. word-of-mouth. Yes, there is a difference and it's important to know.
Are there any other requirements that you set when creating a new campaign? Have you ever walked away from a project or later realized that you should have? What successes have you had and what made people see the value and pass it along?
Technorati Tags:
Gooruze, marketing, Matt Dickman, Seth Godin, social media, Techno//Marketer, viral
I was watching a little primetime TV last night and saw a spot by Toyota for their Tundra line of trucks. The 30 second spot features the virtual world/video game World of Warcraft (WoW), but even if you're not familiar with the WoW you can pretty easily follow along. I think it's very progressive of them to use this concept and I'm sure it's reaching the younger male audience that they're targeting. Here it is if you have not seen it.
Another example of virtual worlds coming to mainstream is the October 24 episode of CSI: NY. In the episode a parallel Second Life experience will allow users to interact in a whodunit of unprecedented proportions. Users will be able to log in to SL and walk through the crime lab, process evidence and try to catch the killer.
Both of these endeavors by such large companies show me that they believe virtual worlds are at a tipping point for their target audiences. I imagine this type of integration will become more common in certain audience demographics as the technology gets easier to use and the experience becomes more easily accessible.
This definitely appeals to a pretty narrow audience, but it's a very hip, young, connected, tech-savvy one. Have you seen any other examples of this type of virtual world integration? What other brands lend themselves to this type of hook given the audience?
Technorati Tags:
innovation, interactive marketing, marketing, Matt Dickman, second life, Techno//Marketer, technology, trends, world of warcraft, Toyota
Gooruze, a new people-driven marketing network, launched yesterday and I am proud to be one of the Founding Gooruze. Founders include Andy Beal, Duncan Riley and Brian Solis among others. The site has picked up a bit of press and is already at 413 members.
The idea behind Gooruze is to allow the community of members to create content, share news, rate each piece of content and filter the information that's out there. It's the democratization of marketing thinking. The site runs on the same rock-solid social platform as Minti.com, the much lauded parenting community.
Andy has the best take on the launch so I'll point you over to him to learn more. Definitely sign up when you get a chance and add me as a friend.
Technorati Tags:
marketing, Matt Dickman, social networks, Techno//Marketer, Gooruze
Don't you hate when a new acronym arrives on the scene? RSS is a term that is confusing to most non-technical people, but when you break it down it's very simple. RSS stands for Really Simple Syndication.
This is also the first video that I am doing in association with the great folks at MarketingProfs. My goal is to reach as many marketers as possible to evangelize new media and demystify technology. MarketingProfs provides an outstanding platform to do this. You'll notice the new title screens on these videos and you can look for more in the coming weeks and months. Also, Ann Handley informed me that I have the distinction of being the first person (not clipart/stock photo) to grace the home page of MarketingProfs. I am really honored!
Key takeaways:
If you have any topics or technobabble that you would like to see me cover, drop me an email or leave a comment!
If you use another reader/podcatcher you can grab my podcast RSS feed here.
You can always watch this and other Techno//Marketer videos on your video channel of choice:
Technorati Tags:
marketing, MarketingProfs, Matt Dickman, RSS, Techno//Marketer, web2.0formarketers, whiteboard//session
Before you ask, no I have not transformed this blog into a photography blog. I want to share a simple little metaphor that I use to shift my thinking from strategy to implementation and back again on a daily basis. I hope that it helps you in your day-to-day.
If you look in the gear bag of any professional photographer you will notice one thing right off the bat. They carry multiple lenses all the time. To the amateur observer, it may look like overkill or waste. Quite the contrary though, each lens is slightly different to capture a unique angle (wide angle vs. telephoto) or work in a specific condition (sports photography vs. super-close, macro photography). Changing your lens changes your mindset. One day you have a huge, telephoto lens to shoot a sporting event and the next day you're crawling around on the ground taking shots of bugs.
That metaphor of the physical changing of the lens is something that I use to adapt to situations in my job and while writing for this blog. If you have a hard time shifting from 30,000 foot view to 3 foot view, this post if geared toward you. Here are the lenses that I think about and what situations I use them in.
The tactician - telephoto - This lens gets you right in the action. It blocks out everything else in the environment and just focuses on one main object. The images that come off this beast are extremely sharp and can freeze even the fastest action. The tradeoff is that you miss everything that happens on the periphery. Most photographers that use this lens also carry an entire other camera with a wide angle lens to get close up action.
Tactics live here. The idea of the telephoto lens is very useful when trying to get things done. I use it to focus on implementing a specific tactic when I need total focus. It comes in handy when evaluating a new social network or reading through RSS feeds. The problem with this lens is that you have to remember to take it off, it's very easy to forget and stay too focused. It's a short-term option and should be used as such.
The generalist - zoom - This is the all-purpose lens. It's wide enough to capture most of the action, but still lets you get pretty close. A photographer could use this lens full time, but they would miss the really wide angle shots and they can't get close enough to the detail.
This is a good way to look at most client situations once the overall strategy is decided. This is the lens I use when I am looking for tactics that are on-point for the client and their industry. It lets you keep the strategy in mind and make sure that the implementation will work. Getting stuck in this lens will not allow you to see broader trends that are emerging, nor will you be able to anticipate the implementation challenges before they arise.
The strategist - wide angle - This is the strategist's lens. The wide angle lets you see everything that is in the environment and how it impacts the subject. You can capture more real estate
This is the lens that lets me look at services like Twitter and Facebook and see their limitations and possibilities. This is client-neutral, but it then lets me operate with what I know about my clients and their industries. That combination is where strategic recommendations come from. The struggle for many who use this lens it to get stuck in this view. The challenge is to take the learning here, shift to the zoom lens with a bit more focus and then finally to the telephoto for implementation.
This is the view through the telephoto lens. Seeing this image you can tell this is a weathervane on the top of a structure. The focus is on the bird shape and little else is known about the surroundings. This could be in Utah, Maine or right next door. It could be on a barn, garage, house or castle. Not much else can be divined by this image, we need more information.
Here is a wider view of the same scene. We can tell a bit more here right? The building is colonial and the weathervane sits high atop a round area with windows. We can't really tell the full environment still at this level, but we can see some shadows from nearby trees for some clues. The house is painted white and there are quite a few windows in the main part of the structure. This could be a house, large horse barn, office building, etc. We need more information.
Viola! Here is the full image. If you don't recognize the house it's Mount Vernon, George Washington's house near D.C. This is the full scene, you can see the entire house, the trees around it tell you the season is summer, the shadows tell you it's mid-afternoon. The weathervane is but a small spot as the environment takes over.
This really does help me to shift from one view to anther and allows me to catch myself when I get stuck in one view. With all of the information bombarding us on a daily basis, it's more crucial than ever to switch lenses fast and often.
Have you ever been stuck in one view? How have you shifted yourself out of it?
Technorati Tags:
marketing, Matt Dickman, strategy, Techno//Marketer, trends
I spent this past weekend in the great city of Chicago cheering on my wife and our friend in their running of the 2007 Chicago marathon. We had a bit of a challenging start to the weekend (flight delayed, missed dinner with friends, long lines at every turn) that served as a foreshadowing to what was in store for them later on Sunday.
If you're not living in the midwest, let me give you an idea of the weather this past weekend. It was FREAKING HOT! So hot that you didn't want to go outside and this is not normal for this time of year. It should have been 55 degrees and it was 85. So translate those temperatures to trying to run 26.2 miles in the middle of the day. A recipe for disaster.
The race started great. 35,000 people shuffling over the start/finish line meant they didn't get into their normal stride until 20 minutes after the leaders started. That's a LOT of people. A group of friends and I stood at mile three to cheer them on. Everybody looked good for the most part, but that didn't last long. We didn't see them again until the 12 mile marker and they looked strong, but definitely feeling the heat. People started falling and sitting down. Only later did they tell us that there was no water until the fifth mile. That's a long time to be running in 85 degree weather. 300+ people were taken to hospitals and 1 runner tragically died.
Needless to say (if you didn't know) they cancelled the race at the 3 hour 30 minute mark. My wife and friend made it to the 18th mile and they were told to start walking back to the start/finish line. There was a lot of confusion and some people kept going (without medical or water support). They got their medals, but felt cheated as they were definitely strong enough to keep going. I am super proud of them both for running strong and dealing with the situation better than I would have.
Race directors denied the fact that water was a scarcity. They claimed that there was plenty of water along the way and all stations were well staffed. But I saw something interesting watching the people run past me. Some carried cameras. They were documenting their runs along the way. Taking photos and videos of the crowds, the empty water stations, people standing in line at gas stations buying water, begging spectators for their water and the neighbors who came to their aid. Kudos to the people of Chicago, but shame on the race organizers.
Here are some of the videos from YouTube:
Here are more videos from YouTube. Here are blog posts about it and Flickr photos too.
I find these videos, photos and blog entries really compelling. You can see the frustration on the faces of people who trained for months only to start running with a lack of support. This situation is playing itself out in other events, in stores and on the street.
Who do you believe? The race organizer or the runners with the cameras? Who will you believe, your customer with the camera or the store manager? This is a movement that's just getting started.
Technorati Tags:
Matt Dickman, Techno//Marketer, user generated content, video, YouTube, 2007 Chicago Marathon
Jaiku is a service that has been on my radar screen for some time now and I've been meaning to do an Inside//Out post on them. So why do one now? Simple, Google acquired the company yesterday (10/9/07). That alone has sent a deluge of marketers to the web trying to learn more about this presence application.
To keep it simple, Jaiku is on the same principle as Twitter (see my earlier video on Twitter here) or Pownce. You have 140 characters to tell people what you're doing, promote something of interest or communicate with colleagues and friends. Communication is one- and two-way through the messaging system. Here is the video with a more in-depth look.
[Feed readers please click through to the post if you cannot see the video]
Similarities to Twitter/Pownce:
Differences:
[Extra:]
Robert Scoble did an interview with the founders of Jaiku on Podtech.
If you use another reader/podcatcher you can grab my podcast RSS feed here.
You can always watch this and other Techno//Marketer videos on your video channel of choice:
Technorati Tags:
Conversations, Inside//Out, interactive marketing, marketing, Matt Dickman, mobile, social media, Techno//Marketer, trends, Twitter, user generated content, Web2.0, Jaiku
I am sure that if you read this blog, or other blogs with a similar focus, you've doubtlessly heard about British band Radiohead's new, open pricing experiment. If you have not, here is the overview. There is no price for their new album "In Rainbows". You as a user choose the price that you are willing to pay for the album and there are no limits. If you want it for free, it's yours. If you want to pay $100, they'll take your money.
While this has been covered by every newspaper and blogger from here to Timbiktu, I want to add a slightly different take on things. I want to tell you about my viewpoint as a FAN. I love Radiohead. I've seen them in concert 5+ times (they don't tour a lot) and I own every album they have produced. When this situation came up, I immediately thought about my valuation of their album using past experience and emotional connection to the band.
So what am I going to pay? $25 (USD). That's more than I've ever payed for a single release album. Why am I paying so much? Here is my thinking. The band has provided me countless hours of enjoyment over the years, set memories to music and given it their all from the CD to the stage. I also know that in the past when I purchase one of their albums, the band gets completely hosed. I remember reading at one point that only about $.50 from each album sale goes to the band members, so this is a chance to make sure they get what they deserve.
I think there are a number of loyal fans that will pay top dollar for this release, but I know there are many who will pay less or take the album for free. (Not sure how it will pan out financially for the band or how they'll be tracked on the charts.) Free isn't necessarily bad though. I guarantee the next time they come to town a lot more people will know who they are and will attend the show, because they'll have their music on their iPod.
Radiohead is a fairly broad-reaching band, but they're not in the mainstream like a U2 or Dave Matthews Band. That would be the ultimate social experiment...can this open pricing model work on a mass, global scale?
This could signal a fundamental shift in the music industry where the content will be the giveaway/promotion as bands make their money touring? What's more profitable, making $.50 a copy or introducing millions of people to your brand?
[UPDATE:] Check out Mack's post with some results and more thinking on this topic.
Technorati Tags:
innovation, marketing, Matt Dickman, social media, Techno//Marketer, Word of Mouth, Radiohead
If you haven't been to a Starbucks in the last week or so, you may have missed a cool new promotion their doing with iTunes. Each day for a month, Starbucks is giving customers a small card (business card size) away with a new artist on it. On the back of the card is a code to redeem the song in the iTunes Music Store.
This is not only a good continuation of the Apple + Starbucks relationship, but a way to simultaneously drive traffic to the physical store (you can only get them in person) and to iTunes. This plays well with the iPhone and iPod Touch relationship that's already been formed between the two companies and shows Starbucks' continued move into the music retail space.
I love this idea on a couple of levels. Not only is there a big benefit to the end user (around $30 in free music), but it most likely will drive the incremental revenue to Starbucks to cover the expense a number of times over. The program also solidifies the music push to Starbucks customers who (most of which) have not ever purchases a CD or other DVD inside the store and it reinforces the position to people who have. Starbucks is also promoting new artists on a national level, the majority of whom I have not heard of.
The other piece of this that I think has hooks into MANY marketing plans is the idea of a physical artifact that ties the offline to the online. This physical card is easy to hand out at the register, easy to shove into a pocket or purse and just as easy to redeem online. These physical ties to the online world are powerful physical reminders and bridges to take offline customers into the online experience.
This strategy is one of the reasons that I love what Hugh MacLeod does, taking artwork on the back of business cards and using them as digital and physical artifacts (or "social objects" as Hugh calls them). Hugh has grown this into work with Stormhoek winery and Microsoft (pictured here), creating elements that drive users to engage with the brands on- and off-line.
What could you create today that could take your current customers or visitors to your website or location on the social network? Is it art on the back of your business card? Is it a USB drive with cool content on it? The possibilities are endless.
Technorati Tags:
Apple, marketing, Matt Dickman, Starbucks, Techno//Marketer, Promotions, itms
Greg Verdino is away on vacation, but he asked me to guest blog on a topic of my choosing while he was gone. On top of being honored to be included with other great bloggers, like Doug Meacham, Ryan Karpeles and Jonathan Baskin, I knew I had to push myself to keep up with Greg's high standards.
The post that I wrote is a press release from the future (2009 to be exact) where Facebook releases a mobile operating system. It's where I think that the mobile, social web could go to truly bring value to the users and leverage mobile technology.
So, if you get a chance, head on over to the post on Greg's blog and check it out. Would love to know what you think.
Technorati Tags:
Greg Verdino, marketing, Matt Dickman, mobile, mobile devices, social networks, Techno//Marketer, technology
Not a day goes by when I don't see complex technical terms thrown around in media press or on blogs. I often wonder if the average marketer knows what half of these terms mean. This new series is aimed at graphically illustrating (this is where the whiteboard comes into play) complex terms in ways that normal, non-geek people can understand.
In this installment, I take a look at AJAX. This is a huge Web2.0 buzzword that you hear all the time, but do you really know what it means? It's actually quite straight forward from a marketing point of view.
AJAX Stands for Asynchronous JAvasript and XML. As a marketer you don't need to know about Javascript, which is a programming language, nor do you really need to know about XML, which is a data storage standard. The Asynchronous part is what is interesting. This allows web pages to behave in a more dynamic, application-like manner. Google's Reader, Mail and Documents all work with AJAX to make them work more fluidly for the end user. Data is transmitted and stored via XML behind the scenes to enable this process to happen.
This is also responsible for the so called "death of the pageview". Pages don't need to reload to get content thereby eliminating impressions. Check out the video for a tutorial on what AJAX is from a 30,000 foot, marketing centric view.
[Feed readers please click through to the post if you cannot see the video.]
Key takeaways:
Is there a term that's confusing you? Do your tech guys like to show you up and you want a little revenge? Email me or leave me a comment with the terms/ideas/buzzwords that you would like to see explained in a future post. Also, let me know if you have ways you think I can improve on this concept.
If you use another reader/podcatcher you can grab my podcast RSS feed here.
You can always watch this and other Techno//Marketer videos on your video channel of choice:
Technorati Tags:
marketing, Matt Dickman, Techno//Marketer, technology, video, Web2.0, AJAX, whiteboard//session, whiteboard
Yesterday was my second day attending the Marketing Profs B2B Forum in Chicago. I met a lot of blog friends and made some new ones. The panel I attended on emerging media and its implications on B2B marketing was a great one and had the audience truly engaged. Here are my takeaways (videos will be coming later).
[From left to right: Chris Yeh, Todd Andrlik, Mike Gamson, Phil Gomes, Matt Lohman and David Armano]David Armano (moderator) | Critical Mass
Todd Andrlik | Leopardo Construction
Matt Lohman | Knowledgestorm
Phil Gomes | Edelman me2revolution
Chris Yeh | Ustream
Mike Gamson | LinkedIn
Related: You can see the MarketingProfs event photo pool on Flickr here.
Technorati Tags:
David Armano, marketing, MarketingProfs, Matt Dickman, social media, Techno//Marketer, Phil Gomes, Chris Yeh, Mike Gamson, Matt Lohman, Todd Andrlik
I am at the MarketingProfs B2B Forum in Chicago. During the networking hour last night, Ann Handley and I took my video camera around and asked people "What have you found when you Google yourself?". The responses from David Armano, Christine (C.B.) Whittemore, Chris Yeh, William Arruda and others are thought provoking and hilarious.
Check my first post on the MarketingProfs Daily Fix blog. Here is the video from the event.
Technorati Tags:
David Armano, marketing, MarketingProfs, Matt Dickman, Techno//Marketer, video, C.B. Whittemore, Chris Yeh, William Arruda, Ann Handley